🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.